Arthur William Hodge Totally Explained

Everything about Arthur William Hodge totally explained

Arthur William Hodge (1763 - 1811) was a plantation farmer, member of the Council and Legislative Assembly and slave owner in the British Virgin Islands who was hanged on 8 May, 1811 for the murder of one of his slaves.
   Hodge was the first, if not the only slave owner executed for the murder of a slave in the British West Indies. He though was not, as some have claimed, the first white person to have been lawfully executed for the killing of a slave. Hodge was born in the British Virgin Islands, studied at Oriel College, Oxford and served in the British Army. His wife was a sister-in-law of the Marquess of Exeter. He was described as a man of great accomplishments and elegant manners and upon his father's death, he returned to the British Virgin Islands to assume control of the family's plantation.
   In 1811, Hodge was tried for the murder of a single male slave, named Prosper. However, during the trial evidence was presented against Hodge in relation to the death several of his slaves, Tom Boiler, Prosper, Cuffy, Margaret and Else. However, it was the death of the last, Prosper, that resulted in Hodge's arrest, trial and ultimately his execution. (Restrictions on similar fact evidence were less consciously observed in colonial courts.) Subsequent estimates have suggested that between 1803 and 1808 Hodge may have murdered as many as sixty of the slaves who worked on his plantation.
   Hodge had certainly previously had over 100 healthy negro slaves on his plantation, but according to Daniel Ross, a witness at the trial, upon the death of Hodge's wife, there were no longer enough slaves to dig a grave for her. Ross was to further testify that he couldn't remember all the names of the negroes who had died in consequence of Hodge's cruelty.

The crime

Hodge wasn't well thought of on Tortola on account of his cruelty towards slaves, and the cruel death that Prosper suffered proved to be the proverbial final step too far.
The main evidence given at the trial relating to the death of Prosper was given by Perreen Georges, a free woman of color. She testified that:
ť "I was present when he [Prosper] was laid down and flogged for a mango which dropt [sic] off a tree, and which Mr Hodge said he should pay six shillings for; he hadn't the money and came to borrow it of me, I'd no more than three shillings; he said to his master that he'd no more money; his master said he'd flog him if he didn't bring it; he was laid down and held by four negroes, on his face and belly, and flogged with a cartwhip; he was under the last better than an hour; he then got up and was carried up to the hill; and his master said he should be flogged again if he didn't bring the other three shillings; he was tied to a tree the next day; and the flogging was repeated; he was licked so long that his head fell back, and he couldn't bawl out any longer; I supposed he was faint; I then went from the window, as I couldn't bear to see any more of it."

The assaults took place on 2 October 1807 and the following day. On 15 October 1807, Prosper eventually died of his wounds. It then took three and half years for Hodge to be brought to trial, not least because he fled from his estates and had to be arrested by warrant. However, this is only a partial excuse; the indictment was only issued 11 March 1811.

The trial

The evidence against Hodge was strong and credible. In a small community like Tortola, most were well aware of the goings on at the Hodge plantation. Hodge's defence wasn't strong. The two strongest prosecution witnesses were Stephen McKeough, a white man who regularly inspected the Hodge estate, and Perreen Georges. Hodge tried to discredit them by alleging that McKeough was a drunk, and Georges was a thief, but both persons would have been well known enough by the jury that the accusations didn't stick. Hodge wisely sought to make no unfounded accusations against Daniel Ross, who also testified against him, as he was a Justice of the Peace.
Hodge called his sister, Penelope, and a witness described as an "old black woman" to give testimony to his innocence, but reports suggest that their evidence was one-sided and not regarded as credible.
As is customary in common law legal systems, the defendant was allowed to address the jury before they retired to consider their verdict, and Hodge said this:
ť "As bad as I've been represented, or as bad as you may think me, I assure you that I feel support in my afflictions from entertaining a proper sense of religion. As all men are subject to wrong, I can't but say that the principle is likewise inherent in me. I acknowledge myself guilty in regard of many of my slaves, but I call God no witness to my innocence in respect to the murder of Prosper. I'm sensible that the country thirsts for my blood, and I'm ready to sacrifice it."

However, the jury were also charged with the words of Richard Hetherington, President of the Council of the Territory:
ť "...the law makes no distinction between master and servant. God created white and he created black creatures; and as God makes no distinction in administering justice, and to Him each is alike, you'll not, nor can you alter your verdict, if murder has been proved - whether on white persons or on black persons, the crime is equally the same with God and the law."

On 30 April 1811, the jury retired to consider their verdict at about half past six in the morning. By eight o'clock, they returned with a guilty verdict. However, a majority of the jurors recommended mercy for Hodge. However, such recommendations are not binding, and the presiding judge, Chief Justice Robertson, pronounced that Hodge should be "hanged by the neck on Wednesday the 8th of May following, until he was dead, on a spot near unto the common prison."

The execution

Governor Hugh Elliot was compelled to commission a militia to prevent reprisals "in a conjuncture so replete with party animosity". He also imposed martial law every night from sunset to sunrise between the handing down of the verdict and Hodge's execution. Finally, he ordered the HMS Cygnet to stand by to support the civilian authorities in case needed. Elliot may have been motivated by a sense of self preservation - he'd been the primary mover behind the arrest and trial of Hodge, and clearly many in the community would have been deeply unhappy about the conviction and proposed execution of a white man for the death of a negro slave.
In the week that followed Hodge was allowed to "make his peace with God", and was attended constantly by two ministers of the Methodist church at St Christophers. On the appointed day, he was led out at the jail. He addressed certain individuals whom he singled out in the crowd, and asked them to forgive him for injuries which they'd received at his hands. He then addressed the crowd generally and asked them to forgive him. Then Arthur Hodge was hanged.
His body was then taken back to his estate and he was buried, ironically not very far from the grave of the poor and luckless Prosper.

The law

At the time of Hodge's trial, slavery was still legal, although the trade in African slaves had been abolished by the Slave Trade Act 1807. Africans who had previously been sold into slavery wouldn't formally be freed until much later, in 1834, under the Slavery Abolition Act 1833.
   In practice, slave owners would often proscribe rules of conduct for the handling of slaves to remove fears of arbitrary or excessive punishments, but these were not binding in law. During his unsuccessful bail application, Hodge's own counsel argued "A Negro being property, it was no greater offense for his master to kill him than it would be to kill his dog," but the court didn't accept the submission. Indeed, the point was dismissed without any serious discussion.
   Part of the answer to the question is probably found in the fact that the boundaries of the legality of slavery were in fact little explored under the common law, and it doesn't seem implausible that slavery could be permitted under the common law on the one hand, but for it to constitute a crime to kill a slave on the other. However, most cases dealing with the status of slaves are well documented and well considered (see generally, slavery at common law). Hodge of course didn't have any opportunity to appeal in the eight days between his conviction and execution.
   Some have suggested that Hodge was hanged for essentially political reasons. There are several reasons why this might be.

A number of slave uprisings had occurred in the British Virgin Islands, including a major one in May of 1790 at the Pickering plantation. The hanging of a notoriously cruel slave owner might have been thought of as a sop to help maintain control of the remaining slave population, who had grown restless as a result of the passing of the Slave Trade Act. If this was the intent, it wasn't effective, as major rebellions broke out subsequently in 1823 and again in 1830, and a major planned revolt was uncovered before it broke out in 1831.
The Governor of the day, Hugh Elliot, was a professed abolitionist. Reports suggest that Elliot personally supervised the proceedings against Hodge, although, as the trial was conducted before an independent judge with a sitting jury, it's unlikely he could have influenced its outcome. He would also wished to have been very careful - as much as he may have disliked slavery personally, he was as aware as anyone else in the British Empire that an economic collapse would be likely in the region without slave labour. But it's noteworthy that nearly three years elapsed without anyone choosing to pursue Hodge at law, until Elliot took up his appointment.
The third is that the Territory was considered at the time to be beset by lawlessness. Elliot was reported to have been struck by the "state of irritation ... almost of anarchy" in the Territory. Arresting a significant local figure like Hodge, putting him on trial and executing him would have been a decisive demonstration of authority in an attempt to restore better legal order.

Whilst it's likely that all of these reasons played a part, it seems that petty personal squabbles played a role. A young man named William Cox Robertson (whos father, it's suggested, may have been killed by Hodge in a duel) had returned to Tortola and become engaged in a three way exchange of insults between himself, Hodge and George Martin. During the series of arguments Martin went to Hodge's house on 3 January 1811 "and there most wantonly insulted and assaulted him" according to court records, before doing the same thing to Robertson later that day. Hodge then made "half-uttered threats of calling [him] out", ie. challenging him to a duel. Hodge was known to be an excellent pistol shot and duellist, and Martin decided that "it better not to fight him, without first attempting to deliver himself from such a desperate enemy, by bringing him to public justice." Musgrave was wealthy and enormously well connected on Tortola. This set in course the chain of events that would ultimately lead to Hodge being arrested and tried for Prosper's death - not in the noble name of seeking justice after an atrocity, but rather more because one man was afraid to fight a duel against another. This isn't to dispute that high minded men like George Elliot acted entirely upon principle. But had it not been for the petty squabbles of richer men, it's unlikely the events would have been set in motion that led to Hodge's historic trial and execution.

Ramifications

The ramifications of the execution of Hodge are difficult to gauge. Some historians suggest that the "case stirred up feverish feelings in the islands, and even echoed to the outside world ... it was revolutionary for the times: this was an unprecedented trial, where a white man was proven guilty for the murder of a black man and sentenced to death." Whilst the trial and execution would unquestionably have come as a shock to the slave owning communities in the British West Indies, it doesn't appear to have had any immediate effect wider than that of Hodge's own plantation. It has been remarked that there were probably many slave owners in the West Indies who were quite as excessive as Hodge, but there doesn't seem to have been a rush to put them on trial, or on their part to moderate their conduct. There appear to be no other records of any slave owners in the British West Indies being tried for the murder of their slaves.
Within the British Virgin Islands themselves, outside of Hodge's estate, slaves were generally considered to have been treated relatively well, which is perhaps not surprising in light of how valuable they'd come since the abolition of the African slave trade. Nonetheless, although the slave's lot continued to be an unhappy one until the general manumission in 1834, at least within the Territory a clear line was drawn in relation to the treatment of slaves.
The trial itself has something of an impact on the Territory's finances. The trial was reported to have cost the Territory nearly six hundred pounds sterling, and to have cost Hodge's estate nearly nine hundred pounds sterling, both extravagant sums for the time.

Descendants

After delivering the verdict in his trial, all of the jurors faithfully swore that to their knowledge Arthur Hodge held no property in the British Virgin Islands. This lie (not being uncommon) avoided the court needing to make an order condemning his property, and allowed his estate to pass to his 6 year old son, Henry Cecil Hodge (ironically Arthur Hodge had sworn his new will during the disputes with Musgrave and Martin which led ultimately to his execution, although there's no suggestion that he feared for his life at this time). Many years later the Hodge estates would be burned to the ground by a freak fire, and Henry Cecil Hodge son was heard to remark to a friend at the time that he'd be forever paying the price of his father's sins.
Arthur Hodge's grandson, Samuel Hodge went on to serve in the British military with great disctinction before being killed in action at the age of 28. He was award the Victoria Cross for actions in the Gambia.
None of Hodge's living descendants live in the British Virgin Islands today, although many of the descendants of his former slaves still do.

Further Information

Get more info on 'Arthur William Hodge'.

External Link Exchanges

Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:

<a href="http://arthur_william_hodge.totallyexplained.com">Arthur William Hodge Totally Explained</a>

Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned.